
[from Athens News, 23.1.09, page 18]
Perspective
* It’s the water, stupid! – Yannis Zabetakis on the importance of good water management
------------------------------------
It’s the water, stupid
Yannis Zabetakis
izabet@chem.uoa.gr
http://www.zabetakis.net/
The author is a senior lecturer of food chemistry and lead auditor in the Chemistry Department at the University of Athens
------------------------------------------------
In Bill Clinton's successful 1992 presidential campaign against George H.W. Bush, the phrase «It's the economy, stupid» was coined by Clinton campaign strategist James Carville. It referred to the notion that
But, despite the enormity of the current global economic crisis, it is not the most crucial crisis facing us today, neither is it the food shortage crisis but is infact the shortage of clean water. Food at affordable prices is not enough for all the people on Earth but in order to produce food, we need water. In speaking to The Economist, chairman of Nestlé, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe said: “the water shortage is an even more urgent problem than climate change”.
How you ever wondered what is the price of 1 m3 (or 1 tonne) of water? Have a look at your invoice of the water authorities in Athens (EYDAP), 1 m3 costs about €0.45. But, people sunbathing in Saint Tropez and using bottled water of Evian, have to pay several hundred euros for 1 m3 of water. In
| |
Water availability has been a “casus belli” for many years. Six years ago,
| |
The problem of good water management is of pivotal importance in both food and agriculture industries and world geopolitics. According to the bank JP Morgan, five big food and beverage giants—Nestlé, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Anheuser-Busch and Danone—consume almost 575 billion litres of water a year, enough to satisfy the daily water needs of every person on the planet (http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11966993)!
Not surprisingly leading environmental agencies are now using the concept of the “water footprint” to describe the direct and indirect water use. The water footprint is defined as the total volume of freshwater that is used to produce the goods and services (http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/home). It is thus not only the amount of water that people and industry are consuming in a country that matters, but also the amount of water that is used for all food that is imported to this country from all over the world! Intriguingly, the production of one kilogram of beef requires 16.000 litres of water whereas we need 140 litres of water to produce one cup of coffee! Japan with a footprint of 1150 cubic meter per capita per year, has about 65% of its total water footprint outside the borders of the country and the US water footprint is 2500 cubic meter per capita per year.
In
But it is not only this part of the world, where water management is poor. In
“Water is the oil of the 21st century,” declares Andrew Liveris, the chief executive of Dow, a chemical company. Like oil, water is a critical lubricant of the global economy. And as with oil, supplies of water—at least, the clean, easily accessible sort—are coming under enormous strain. Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, estimates that global water consumption is doubling every 20 years, which it calls an “unsustainable” rate of growth. Water, unlike oil, has no substitute! Untrammelled industrialisation, particularly in poor countries, is contaminating rivers and aquifers.
http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11966993)
The link between food and water
It takes about one litre of water to produce one calorie from food crops. But the biggest variable is our diet. Europeans and Americans have for years had high proportions of meat in their diets, but now this trend is catching on in emerging markets as incomes rise. Meat requires ten times the water withdrawn per calorie by plants. So the average daily diet in
Urgent solutions are needed
Scientists do have solutions: better irrigation practices in farming may reduce freshwater withdrawals almost by half. Some crops are better grown in water-rich countries, others grow well with relatively little water. If water had a price, and if farm products could be traded freely and without subsidies across borders, a water-efficient allocation of production would follow. The political subsidies for biofuels must stop immediatelly until more water-efficient crops are established (i.e. the so called second and third generation plants). Leading food industries must start using water more efficiently: soft drink giants are using about 3 litres of water for every litre of soft drink it produces but one greek branch is using double this (i.e. six litres of water per litre of soft drink).
All in all, politicians and industry people must construct a “water new deal” as soon as possible. The climate change should stop being the first environmental priority.

0 σχόλια:
Post a Comment